Post by account_disabled on Dec 28, 2023 11:29:35 GMT
Aprocess established by the petitioner was overturned . Thus from the witnesss statement corroborated with the petitioners claims the court considers that the fact found and sanctioned by the verbal process does not correspond to reality the petitioner not passing the red light. This finding of the court is based both on the evidence administered and on the fact that in the absence of any evidence provided by the respondent who proved an inactive procedural attitude by reference to the application in question of the presumption of innocence provided of art. of the.
ECHR applicable according to the jurisprudence of the European Country Email List Court and the contravention matter. Therefore the presumption as a means of proof by which the law establishes the legality of the record of the finding and sanctioning of the contravention is in compliance with the presumption of innocence if it allows its proof or in the present case it was overturned according to art. C.proc.civ. on by the petitioner and administered before the court in the absence of any defense of the respondent and a means of evidence from which the commission of the contravention emerges. Accept the complaint. Cancel the verbal process together with all the sanctions applied by it.
It exempts the petitioner from paying the fine of lei. JURY Cancellation of the minutes for the reason that the deed was not ascertained by the ascertaining agents own senses In fact through the verbal process the petitioner was sanctioned with a contravention fine in the amount of lei for committing the aforementioned act. of art. letter corroborated with art. letter f of the republished GEO Application Regulation stating that he voluntarily parked irregularly in the time interval .. in the intersection of the streets mentioned above and sanctioned by disp. Art. paragraph and paragraph letter.
ECHR applicable according to the jurisprudence of the European Country Email List Court and the contravention matter. Therefore the presumption as a means of proof by which the law establishes the legality of the record of the finding and sanctioning of the contravention is in compliance with the presumption of innocence if it allows its proof or in the present case it was overturned according to art. C.proc.civ. on by the petitioner and administered before the court in the absence of any defense of the respondent and a means of evidence from which the commission of the contravention emerges. Accept the complaint. Cancel the verbal process together with all the sanctions applied by it.
It exempts the petitioner from paying the fine of lei. JURY Cancellation of the minutes for the reason that the deed was not ascertained by the ascertaining agents own senses In fact through the verbal process the petitioner was sanctioned with a contravention fine in the amount of lei for committing the aforementioned act. of art. letter corroborated with art. letter f of the republished GEO Application Regulation stating that he voluntarily parked irregularly in the time interval .. in the intersection of the streets mentioned above and sanctioned by disp. Art. paragraph and paragraph letter.